Election 2014: Sliver of Silver Lining

By Pohutu

Setting aside the economy, which I appreciate (a) one can’t do and (b) one shouldn’t do, here’s my non-expert election silver lining: Social and moral conservatism made no headway in this election. And keeping in mind aforementioned need to prioritise economic (and I’d say environmental) issues, keeping the moral conservatives at bay is actually a lot more important than it’s often given credit for. But more on that later…first my attempt at reasoning:
1. The Conservative party didn’t make it. Yes, I appreciate they gained ground on 2011, but there was clearly no significant appetite for their brand of moral conservatism, as in get rid of the “anti-smacking law”, introduce binding citizen referendums (which are a pathway to moral polarisation through nasty campaigns in which big money — conservatives — usually have a leg up) and…well, they check the boxes on issues like being anti-abortion, “tough on crime” (aka candidate Garth McVicar previously of the
Senseless Sensible Sentencing Trust etc.) Like ACT, they’re also big on “one law for all” – aka anti-Maori dog-whistling.
2. The Greens held their ground, and they’re the party that had the most progressive social and moral policies, actually coming out in support of decriminalising abortion, for example — the only major party (major third party anyway) to ever do so. It didn’t hurt them, because people aren’t voting on those issues –> because NZers are not socially and morally conservative.
3. Labour was totally wimpy on abortion, trying to do its usual side-step: Its policy was to have the Law Commission investigate the issue. As I said, people aren’t voting on the abortion issue, but Labour’s position and subsequent poor showing scotches any argument that moral conservatism might have hurt the Green vote.
4. ACT did really badly despite its eagerness to continue the Brash tradition of being anti-Maori, with one of its main slogans being “One Country, One Law”. Clearly I’m including anti-Maori racism as falling under the “social and moral issues” umbrella, which one might dispute. But accepting that for a moment, there appears to have been no appetite among voters to go down that road. (I suppose you could argue Hone Harawira’s loss might count against my thesis here, but I think that was an anti Kim Dotcom thing.)
5. Winston is a moral conservative of a weird stripe, but moral issues are not his brand. He gains / and gained / votes because of his nativism and his maverick brand, not because he’s, say, anti-choice.
6. John Key is a social and moral centrist, if not a liberal in fact. He’s pro-choice (though he tries to be a fence-sitter when it comes to talking about it or acting on it), not a homophobe and doesn’t seem to want to re-criminalise prostitution. He’s also an atheist (yay!) And it was John Key who won the election.

All of which is to say that if you are looking at whether or not we’re on the road to a U.S. style scary moral conservatism, joined at the hip with economic conservatism, then I think it’s clear from this election result that we’re not.

And, as I said, social and moral issues/attitudes are important. Oftentimes, social and moral policy translates into economic policy anyway. It sure does, for example, in the case of reproductive rights. Social and moral conservatism can polarise an electorate/a country in ways economic conservatism can’t, and that kind of polarisation is ugly and destructive. It, in turn, can facilitate economic polarisation. So the fact, on my reading of the results anyway, that we are not at least heading down that particular road is, I would argue, a solid piece of silver in the lining of the black election cloud.

Posted in Abortion, Environment, Maori, NZ Politics, Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Forget About Spying

There’s something about the obsession of the progressive left on “spying” that bothers me. Sure, the mass surveillance that’s going on of citizens by their governments should be opposed, even though deep down – or not so deep down – I think we’ve gone Get_Smartway past the possibility of stopping it. And more power to the activists and whistle-blowers and journalists who have exposed it. Because even if, per above, we never manage to stop governments and corporations from doing it, it’s crucial that we’re kept up to date about where and how and why they’re doing it. At least then, the cleverest among us can come up with work-arounds. No, what bothers me is the priority this issue seems to get when I can’t help feel it should be much lower down the list than, say, global inequality, war, climate change (not necessarily in that order). I’ve had this argument, uh, discussion with my partner, who disagrees. He sees the “surveillance state” as a super important issue because of the danger of dictatorship that comes with the ability to know what everyone is doing, not to mention the handing over to the government and corporates (and other surveillors) the ability to covertly blackmail people who haven’t done anything wrong (maybe they have some compromising pix on their phone, or had an affair or an abortion or a facelift).

There are some tests I like to run on political issues before I get involved: will it challenge/undermine the status quo: i.e. will it challenge capitalism, will it challenge racism, will it challenge the patriarchy (which, yeah, it’s old but I still think it (a) exists and (b) is a huge problem), will it challenge the power structures in society? I suppose, if I’m honest, I don’t really think protesting mass surveillance does that. I don’t think capitalism, the military industrial complex, male hegemony, etc., is too bothered by all of this, despite the noise they make. I could be wrong. I could so very well be completely wrong. After all, the way the U.S. has gone after the journalists and the whistle-blowers suggests its leadership (aka corporate America) feels very threatened. Which in turns suggests it does challenge the status quo.

Yes, I think this over reaction to Snowden, to Assange, to Chelsea Manning (slightly different, but related) is the best piece of evidence suggesting I am indeed wrong about this. And that the surveillance state should, perhaps, be at the very top of the agenda.

Clearly, my position (“being vaguely bothered”) isn’t too well thought out, but I can’t help see this as a middle-class activist issue (a category I myself am in). But if our government said it was pulling out of the Five Eyes spy group right now, was dismantling all of its spying infrastructure and programmes – and if it actually did this – what difference would it make to people who are poor? To women who don’t have reproductive rights? To polluted waterways, endangered species, global warming? I don’t think it would make the teeniest tiniest little bit of difference.

Which doesn’t really counter my partner’s argument about the risks of mass surveillance. On the other hand, there have been many dictatorships that pulled it off quite well without all this technology. You just need to get everyone to become an informant on everyone else. You don’t need access to the population’s text messages and locations and emails. Dictatorship is always a risk, with or without mass surveillance. That, of course raises another question: Has the rise of mass surveillance increased the risk? I think the answer to that remains open.

What’s more, IMHO, all the lefties who are all burned up about mass surveillance should take another look at what difference it would really make if they got their way on this one issue. Right now. To (most) people’s lives. My answer: none.

Posted in NZ Politics | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

Dirty, Dirtier, Dirtiest Politics

I’ve finally finished Nicky Hager’s Dirty Politics.   I could have read it quickly.  It isn’t long and it wasn’t as though I wanted to savour its contents by reading slowly.  The exact DirtyPoliticsopposite was true.  It took some willpower to go on after getting about halfway through on the first night.   It was the grubby feeling one gets when exposed to war porn or court cases on television and simply switches off.

At the launch Hager spoke haltingly about the books contents:  it’s awful, bloody awful.  The following morning I felt terribly sad for him, driven as he is to expose the dark, ugly side of politics and demand better of our politicians.  And ourselves.  Proud of our democracy we pretend too often nothing too ugly is going on.   One good outcome for me was a sea change in the level of respect shown for Hager’s hard work and credibility in many mainstream media outlets.  It is long overdue but may encourage more investigative journalism which currently requires considerable financial sacrifice and very hard, sometimes unpleasant work.  Not to mention nasty, sometimes threatening personal attacks.

Andrew Geddis excellent piece on the The Pundit blog best describes the book as a Cri de Coeur’.  Oh indeed.   I would advise reading Geddis’ review at the very least as he includes excerpts he considers worst.  Better still buy the book.   Don’t let it get you down and switch off because, as Hager compellingly argues, that is exactly what the perpetrators of dirty politics want us to do.   VOTE, ENCOURAGE AND HELP OTHERS TO GET OUT AND VOTE.

POSTSCRIPT:   Like most media, I got it wrong in regard to the subject of the book.  Great, I’m not into mystical claptrap.   Here’s another crystal ball effort:  Key is waiting, desperately and too late to save face,  for Judith Collins to fall on her sword.

Posted in Media, NZ Politics, Uncategorized | Tagged , | Leave a comment

National Spooked: Sneer, Jeer and Smear

I got fed up with politics and media for a few weeks but my Cousin Zelda persona (she who tries to influence rugby and league games by crying drop the ball, send the thug off, miss the goal) reasserted itself in a state of increasing confusion.  Highly personable John Key who had such charm with electors has gone rogue, sneering, smearing and jeering.  Steven Joyce is an able assistant and his performance on The Nation in over-talking Grant Robertson and  cackling at his own wit may have encouraged Key to make more use of his own unpleasant persona.   Or something seriously bad about National/ Key is waiting in the wings?   I had it confirmed from Nicky_Hagerthe man himself, Nicky Hager, that a book was coming out but contents under wraps.  We’ll know all by tonight.

National victory had seemed a cert so why sully their image?   Modest caution about polls is wise but the hysteria now emerging is jarring, ugly. The main object of their spooked  behaviour  is Internet Mana who, according to their own arguments, is not even worthy of derision and can be ignored on account of the shabby dealings with Dotcom.    Or were National’s dealings to Dotcom even more shabby?

The word  frenzied  has cropped up in respect of Internet Mana’s meeting in Christchurch and the ‘swearing video’.  Gordon Campbell’s delightful piece on this is on the Scoop website.  It confirms my memory of living through a significant culture change in god’s own country.   Less delightful was the blonde on TVNZ  News almost foaming with frenzy as she recycled the word.   The way Nats recycle such words makes me wonder if they have zombie implants in their brains.

Labour’s Think Positive: a stunningly good slogan.  Cunliffe just has to stop apologising (great piece by Jane Clifton in The Listener) and the party pull together.   Some hope.   Out comes male identity politics of the sort best exemplified by Shane Jones.  It’s seems to be a a compulsive form of narcissism requiring men working in a collective to cause trouble if they don’t get their own way.   Nobody expects the left wing to behave as if they have brain implants a la National but airing divisions and infighting in mainstream commentary and on the internet  in an election year is not acceptable.

Internet Mana: Wow.  Lots of publicity as National magnifies their ‘threat’ and shifts the focus from their own failed policies.   This should backfire.

Greens:  Working hard.  Should enjoy and have earned a late run in the polls.

The Rest:  wouldn’t be missed.

Posted in Media, NZ Politics | Tagged , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

The Palpable Threat of Dotcom

Coverage of Dotcom at an  Internet Mana meeting in Christchurch delighted me.   Two public relations experts, both women, didn’t see the fun however.   A new low, said one,  like a Nazi rally.   The crowd, young, laughing, exuberant chanted ‘Fuck Dotcom_NZHJohn Key’.  Quelle horreur!  Dotcom roared: “Are you ready for revolution?”  He concluded with the threat to come down (from the stage) and give everyone a big hug.  Now that could be of concern given his size.   Curiously the detail of this awesome threat to public safety wasn’t mentioned by either the of the women or the  journalist reporting their comments.  I thought the crowd looked so happy and clean living  I wondered if a few young Nats hadn’t gone along for the ride.  I can’t quite reconcile chanting ‘fuck you’ with a Nazi rally and clean living Hitler Youth.   If there were any elements of the hard left there (is there one in New Zealand other than in John Key’s fevered imagination) I think they would have been wincing or snarling in despair.  I guess it is all in the eye of the beholder, an aged crone in this instance, for whom the term ‘fuck you’ is daily fare in respect of all manner of irritations.

Posted in NZ Politics | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

Is John Key the Real Heir to Muldoon?

Power has apparently gone to John Key’s head.  Nothing exemplifies this better than his initiation of a witch-hunt against the public servant allegedly responsible for the mishandling of the case of of the Malaysian diplomat accused of sexual assault.

Screen Shot 2014-07-08 at 18.53.28In consequence there is now a second victim, coincidentally a woman, and that is  the public servant.  Silence is her only option.  The Prime Minister has effectively called for her to resign.  That is constructive dismissal.   He has exposed her to trial by public opinion.  That flouts our employment laws and her  right to natural justice.   His words were:  “Justice should be undertaken in New Zealand through our legal process, not offshore.  If that person doesn’t have clarity about that position, then they ought to think very strongly about their exact position”.   Within 24 hours of his ‘assault’ on her competence, she was named in the media.  How her name was obtained was not explained.

Only this morning, I was pleased to find that the Public Service Association had issued a statement pointing out that Key’s comments breach the Cabinet Manual and the State Sector Act.   No big headlines however.

The Prime Minister’s call for an inquiry to be headed by John Allen, the head of Mfat, is ludicrous.

Continue reading

Posted in Media, NZ Politics | Tagged , , , | 1 Comment

Funny Old White Men & Internet-Mana

Where do funny old white men come from?   Caves?  (Sorry, I’m trying to belatedly improve my speed of smart response so I can be as funny as a man). I know where some funny (in the funny peculiar sense) old white men are nestling nowadays – in Granny Herald’s commentary coop, namely Bob Jones and Rodney Hide.

9o7n6Another nestles in an armchair close to hand and used to enjoy reading out Jones’ comments in the old Dominion.  I guess Bob was funny some of the time but  one very bad morning he got stuck into the Māori welcome ceremony.   So backward.  “Huzzah” shouted my mate. That released a torrent of adrenalin into my brain.  “Where do you think ceremonies involving gun toting soldiers came from?”  I brilliantly responded.  “Foreign ambassadors and local bodyguards go hand in hand in history.  Popping a large knife under a cloak and into your host could do quite a bit of damage, political and personal.   Ambassadors even took along food tasters in case mine host popped poison into them.”  Or somesuch.

Later, or maybe earlier, witty  Bob accepted a knighthood and overlooked its mediaeval trappings.   I presume he knelt, got smitten with a sword in a ceremony straight out of Ivanhoe, a slightly  fanciful tale with jousts galore written by Sir Walter Scott in 1820.  In the not very good film the knight hero was played by handsomish Robert Taylor who was getting on, had a remarkable widow’s peak and a wooden acting style.  Elizabeth Taylor was the lovely persecuted Jewess and second fiddle heroine.   The first fiddle didn’t rate but got the man.

Another occasion of brilliance which led my son to christen me Cousin Zelda after I joined the ‘boys’ to watch afternoon sport on TV.  (Too old to garden in rain and a penchant for crashing down slimy steps).  My first response to the action was “great thighs”.  Following the stunned silence I got into the spirit of things and yelled ‘miss the goal,  drop the ball, send him off etc’ in support of thighs’ team, and had unexpected success. My powers have weakened and the thighs vanished but my unpatriotic sense of fair play still finds some favour with the gods.

My latest vision came after seeing Laila Harre looking very elegant indeed on television about a week before the announcement of the Internet Mana party.  I wondered if she was be thinking of standing as an independent MP in Epsom.  I thought that would be fun.

Which brings me back to Hyde and Jones: both succumbed to a lack of originality and no little bile in regard to Internet-Mana in this week’s columns.  I rarely read their efforts but something out there said I must.  Hyde got stuck into Laila Harre.    She had been bought by Dotcom.   Keep up old man, Laila told all, detailed her comfortable financial position and said money had not been discussed.   It has been decided that candidates would be paid at backbencher rates.  Old Bob chose John Minto as his main target.    Both men nearly choked on their harrumphs.

Curiously it is the money issue that appears to obsess National devotees.  Lefties are more bothered by the political principles involved.   I’m delighted with my own swift adaptation (no money involved) to accepting Mana’s strategy.   A strategic roadblock has been exploited by National.  Internet-Mana decides to try the same ploy and prissy Tories cry foul!!   Internet Mana has announced support for abolition of the coat-tail clause as part of its policy.  Has anybody heard National hollering with joy and pinching this policy too?

And not quite on the subject did you see the blonde TV1 newsreader  turned vampire frenziedly salivating for Cunliffe’s blood last night?  What should have been a question – was he advocating for Liu’s citzenship wayback – was put as a fact.   Maurice Williamson went down for this.   Well, no, he didn’t.  He went down for ringing the police on Li’s behalf when he was a Minister not a backbencher.  Quite a different constitutional position.

Cunliffe doesn’t learn from his mistakes.   Or have Key’s smarts.  Hey man, National’s pinched your policies so why not appropriate his brain fades?   Many of us need to learn to preface events we rely on memory to describe with the words ‘I think’.   Me too, please note.

I had a quick glance at Seven Sharp and was transfixed by Mike Hosking’s messianic injunction  to exercise my choice and get rid of Cunliffe.    I missed the gloves off stage.  Sounds just like the State of Origin league match later where it was all on in the first half but, as the commentators lamented, no football.  Do TV1’s front people need to take a lesson from sports commentators in non-partisanship?   Oh how the world is changing!

Posted in Media, NZ Politics, Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment